**Trigger warning for mentioning suicide**
In my last post, I said that Nikki Hiltz, an American 1500-meter runner, is a mean girl. This is because she publicly belittled a woman for having the temerity to speak up about fairness for women in the Boston marathon, an event Hiltz doesn’t run. I’m not saying a middle-distance runner shouldn’t comment on longer events, but the way she went about it was cruel. She really comes off as arrogant in her approach.
Though Hiltz demands others use they/them pronouns when referring to her, I won’t because she is biologically female and races in the women’s division. Cutting off her breasts or other body parts doesn't change her sex, so she is allowed to continue racing in the women’s division. And I’m allowed to call her “she” regardless.
After she claimed she was a transgender individual and then changed that to nonbinary, probably to avoid addressing any backlash for not wanting to compete in the men's division if she felt so strongly about being a man, it's hard to believe much of what she says, though she could just be confused and suffering from body dysmorphia or gender dysphoria. At one point, she claimed she was both, which isn’t possible unless you live in make-believe land.
In addition to being a standout on the track in middle-distance events, Hiltz is outspoken about transgender and non-binary rights. In other words, she promotes biological men racing against women, even though she has the luxury of competing and profiting by running in a protected category for her event. She’s OK if other women don’t have that right, is how that translates.
Regarding biological men in the women’s division, Hiltz claims that nonbinary and trans athletes aren’t winning and seems to suggest they’re not even competing at the elite level at all, but, contrary to her claims, it does happen, more than she thinks it does. Here’s an ongoing list of events that, according to Hiltz, don't happen: The Lists - search by category. Apparently, she forgot about what happened in the Olympics in Rio in 2016, too. There, three biological men took top honors in the 800. These three are DSD athletes, but what follows will address that as well.
None of this affects her directly, though, so her attitude is one of not giving a shit. The only thing she seems to care about is spewing rhetoric. But why doesn't she care about younger athletes? As a top athlete, shouldn't she be concerned about the future of women's sport and providing girls and young women with the opportunity to compete on a level playing field? I sure want that. I hope young girls and women get a chance to feel what it’s like to break the tape and confidently toe the line knowing they stand a chance to win.
In a recent interview, if you want to call it that, Hiltz complains about the new policy World Athletics has put in place to protect the female category. This policy includes a one-time cheek swab or blood test to detect the SRY gene for anyone competing in the women's field. It is an extremely accurate test and is correct in determining testes 99.99 percent of the time. An anomaly would require further investigation and a conference with the athlete and his or her trainers. The point is to prevent what happened at the Olympics in Rio in the 800 from happening again. This policy is designed to protect women and the women's category in sports.
In the interview, Hiltz admits that she doesn't have a clue what she’s talking about, and it’s unlikely she has any interest in learning more about DSD conditions or genetics, or the actual test put in place by World Athletics for that matter. I will add more information on this at the end of the post for anyone who is interested. Hiltz basically babbles the equivalent of, "I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THIS TEST IS FOR, BUT HERE'S MY OPINION ANYWAY!" Imagine not knowing what the test is, yet acting all high and mighty, and then speculating about what it means for the test to be in place. It's utterly absurd. Her arrogance is truly stunning here.
What’s most shocking is how freely and loudly she spews complete horseshit. The lies just roll off her tongue, and it’s clear she doesn’t give a crap about facts or about others. She comes off as someone who only wants to hear herself talk. She just loves that spotlight.
In what might be considered the dumbest response of all time, Nikki Hiltz claims that the World Athletics policy is a "slippery slope." She falsely claims that, even though this test is harmless, it could set a precedent and lead other organizations to conduct more invasive testing, only it doesn't and wouldn't. These spooky organizations Hiltz created in her own head wouldn't be able to successfully use invasive methods to test sex if World Athletics won't recognize these make-believe investigations as valid. There is zero evidence that any kind of invasive testing would happen. If it did, it wouldn't be because of the policy. But Hiltz has an agenda. Truth doesn't really matter as long as she gets her message out, that non-binary and trans athletes' rights trump everyone else's.
As one reader already pointed out, Hiltz established herself as a liar when she posted incorrect information about a non-binary teen, claiming this person was murdered when the cause of death was actually suicide. She never addressed the issue again, even after major publications and the media as a whole clarified what had happened, that the death was self-inflicted. In this particular tragedy, the young teen threw water at a group of individuals, and then there was an altercation that did not result in the teen's death. Sadly, the teen later committed suicide. If Hiltz meant that possible bullying may have contributed to a suicide, that's not what she said. Hiltz outright claimed the teen was murdered. Words matter. Accuracy matters. Hiltz does not care.
Continuing with the interview, Hiltz grabs all kinds of fake statistics out of her own ass. She claims that two percent of the population is intersex and that it's as common as red hair. It's not. The correct statistics state it's closer to .018 percent and not nearly as common as having red hair. Again, she shows her ignorance, yet is so unbelievably confident in her fabrications.
In another jaw-dropping moment of stupidity, she then claims that some people may have been "growing a Y chromosome" at some point, and then it POOF just goes away, disappears, just like that. This is so ridiculous it's hard to know how to address the claim, but no, chromosomes don't suddenly disappear like that. Sex is fixed before the birth of the baby.
Perhaps realizing that she's flailing around in unfamiliar territory, Hiltz then uses whataboutism after stumbling through her clownish explanation of genetics and claims that abusive coaches and doping (lol) are more important to consider than women having their category erased. The whole thing is cringy to watch. I almost feel bad for her for being so naive (or is she cunning?), but, sadly, there are fans of hers who will stand behind her, no matter how ridiculous her claims.
It's unfortunate that so many podcasters, journalists, and fellow athletes support her, even when she is lying or intentionally being unkind. I think with this latest video interview, though, at least more people will realize she shouldn't be taken seriously.
For those interested, below are some links that are helpful when discussing the topic of biological men in women's sports:
World Athletics policy and testing
Nonbinary and gender dysphoria
No comments:
Post a Comment